For me one of the most attractive things about the Ragnarok
myth is that it is the end of the gods rather than the end of the world so it’s
rather galling that this is generally dismissed as a later Christian nod
towards resurrection. I see it as a perfectly brilliant way of being able to
have your mythical cake and eat it; by assuming Ragnarok has happened you can
move onto new beliefs whilst still leaving room in your imagination for an
older world view which on a wild winters night - or the disconcerting white
nights of a northern summer - or during the cataclysmic reality of a world war
may not seem so very far away from possibility. I mention this because A.S Byatt also dismisses the idea of renewal and I thought I might hold it against her, but she does it in such a way that I can't. She really is very, very, good.
I’ve been anticipating this book for what has probably been
the best part of a year now, I even read ‘The Penguin Book of Norse Myths’ in preparation (and very good it was too). A.S. Byatt is without doubt my
favourite living writer particularly when she’s writing short stories and
novellas. It might have been a question as to whether this book could ever live
up to my hopes for it – honestly it far exceeded them.
It’s a good myth to start with, though I think this is the
point to say that I’m a bit vague about the difference between myths and fairy
tales. I think I can tell the difference when I’m reading one but an actual definition
remains elusive, not least because I feel that there are elements in many myths
which are basically fairy stories but put them all together and they become more
than the sum of their parts. Most deities are fairly one dimensional but the Norse
men had Loki, a shape shifting Lord of Misrule, a god of chaos and curiosity,
both Odin’s foster brother and the agent of Ragnarok. In short a complicated
character.
What Byatt does with Ragnarok is tell it through the experience
of a thin child in wartime. The child takes what she needs from her reading
which is not necessarily belief but something more like recognition. Meanwhile Byatt
uses (and I liked this too) the traditional structure of the cycle to add in
her own lists of things that the child does believe in – nature and the
weather, although we know what the child doesn’t, that these common things are
no longer common, the destruction continues.
As all good story tellers should Byatt also adds her own
distinct twist to events. The chapter on Jörmungandr the world serpent is my favourite
and will bear several rereading (as will the whole book). Jörmungandr
in this telling is cast into the sea as a small creature who eats then devours
and all the time grows until she spans the earth. All the time she becomes ever
more monstrous and angry until the day when she’ll join her father and brother
for the final battle.
Like all the best books finishing this has left me feeling
slightly bereft, intent on reading again soon, and desperately curious to
follow up with more reading around the subject. The hard back is pricy, the
kindle version more reasonable, I’m glad I got a proof copy and didn’t have to
wait for the paperback because I think this may be the best book I’ve read all
year – there is stiff competition for this title, none of them have been duffs.
Honestly this book is worth picking up.


