My introduction to Nancy Mitford came in the form of an
omnibus edition containing ‘Love in a Cold Climate’, ‘The Pursuit of Love’, ‘The
Blessing’ and ‘Don’t Tell Alfred’ (though possibly not in that order). Her
blend of funny and elitist seemed desperately sophisticated to my younger self
and though I haven’t read them for a long time I imagine I’d still enjoy those
books given that I had fun with ‘Wigs on the Green’, ‘Pigeon Pie’, and ‘Highland
Fling’.
Nonfiction is a different kettle of fish so despite knowing
about the four biographies that Mitford wrote I’ve never felt that tempted by
them. However someone at Vintage very kindly offered me some of their re-prints
and I couldn’t say no and having said yes had to start reading. So far I’ve
tackled ‘The Sun King’ and as members of my online book group already know I
struggled with it a bit. It didn’t help that I came to it straight after my
Georgette Heyer binge (it occurs to me that in a Heyer book Mitford would be a villainess).
As a biographer Kloester is quite discreet and very thorough. Mitford is
neither, nor is she much of an historian, or balanced, or impartial.
She’s also a confirmed Francophile which I am not to the
point that people who are really annoy me – I mean France is okay and everything
but my experience of it does not lead me to believe it’s an earthly paradise,
and furthermore several of their winemakers are lax in the matter of bar codes
which marred my working life for a decade. However once I’d got past all that
the book began to grow on me. What Mitford seems to have done is trawl through
the history cherry picking all the juiciest scandals (poisoning, witchcraft,
Devil worship, secret marriages, infidelity, and so on) and through it
altogether with her personal take on the characters involved. She liked the Sun
King (although inexplicably she spends almost a page discussing his appearance with
reference to how exotic/Jewish it was which feels shockingly inappropriate in a
post war book.
She approved of Mme de Montespan despite her dabbling in the
black arts, but I don’t think she found Mme Maintenon (a later mistress,
possibly wife) as attractive – there are certainly no attempts to defend her
less appealing characteristics as there are with Mme De Montespan’s. Now that I’ve
got used to Mitford’s tone I’m quite happy to read on and find what she has to
say about Frederick the Great, Voltaire, and Madame de Pompadour and can
recommend ‘The Sun King’ in all its gossiping, bitchy, partisan glory (with
some reservations – this isn’t for the faint hearted, easily offended, or the
liberal – I would no longer invite Mitford to my fantasy dinner party).
I have a battered old copy left over from A Level history, though reading your review not sure how appropriate it would have been. I've been thinking about a re read & now I know what's in store for me.
ReplyDeleteeak maybe not for me. I see that Antonia Frazer has also written on on the Sun King which I was thinking of, her research always tends to be very good.
ReplyDeleteJoan Hunter Dunn, on reflection I would probably have adored it when I was 17 - all that slightly salacious gossip would have been irresistible.
ReplyDeleteJessica - don't be put off, Antonia Frazer would without doubt be better for research and fact, but Mitford tells a good story and keeps it very human, she's a guts and all sort of lady.