This book was a very kind gift from Elaine Random Jottings
who quite correctly thought I would be interested in a life of one of my
favourite authors. I’m not generally much of a biography/non-fiction reader but
after a few Heyer based conversations I was really keen to read this in the
hope that I would get to know the woman behind the books. Kloester is
protective of her subject which suited me; Georgette Heyer was notoriously
private and though I don’t doubt that she would have found the idea of being
written about nauseating (a phrase she seems to have used a lot) I think this
book respects her boundaries. There are no salacious details, but then there
aren’t any in her romances either – it’s not what you go to Heyer for, and there
probably isn’t very much for people who aren’t fans – but there are no shortage
of fans out there so I don’t fear for Kloester’s sales.
I knew from Wikipedia that money troubles were a theme of
Heyer’s career but I hadn’t really taken on board that from the age of nineteen
she was taking responsibility for her family’s finances. Her first advance went
to her father and after his sudden death a few years later she became
responsible for keeping her mother and two younger brothers, a responsibility
that never seems to have come to an end. Later on she was the sole breadwinner
in her own household whilst her husband re trained for the bar and this was before
she was really earning big money. Life for Georgette seems to have been a very
unromantic series of demands from the Inland Revenue and constant work to keep
everything going – which is something most of us can relate to.
It also seems like she was somewhat let down by people who
should have been taking care of her – publishers and accountants mostly,
publishers who didn’t bother to read her work but just took the books and made
money from them, and an accountant who royally messed up her finances.
I think too I now understand why so many critics have been
hostile to Georgette. The first clue was her lack of a university education –
Dorothy L. Sayers made much of hers and it didn’t do her any harm. Mostly
though I think it was her sound sense of the commercial that denied her the
recognition she latterly craved. It doesn’t seem to matter that a book is well
written, funny, intelligent, or that thousands want to read it – it’s seemingly
a lapse of taste to provide the public with what they want. Heyer’s reality was
that she had to sell books; that she had a gift for writing best sellers isn’t
something she should be despised for.
I think that had she concentrated on more
contemporary fiction, and been less prolific, Heyer would have been seen as a
much more serious proposition – but where would have been the fun in that? Her
books are the perfect vehicles for escape, her craftsmanship superlative, and I
don’t think anyone has ever done what she did better.
Totally agree!!
ReplyDeleteI admire Heyer for remembering who she was writing for, and for sticking with what she was good at. Thank you again for the book Elaine - it's been much appreciated.
ReplyDeleteI'm so looking forward to this. I hadn't thought about her lack of education - that's a really interesting point. I do agree with you, that nobody " has ever done what she did better."
ReplyDeleteI can't wait to read this! Christmas seems a long time away - I may have to treat myself before that.
ReplyDeleteLisa May, I can't help but think that as an intelligent self educated woman she probably annoyed less successful university educated types. Maybe. Speculation really.
ReplyDeleteCaptive Reader - nothing beats Heyer's books but it has been interesting reading about her.
ReplyDelete