Or ‘As My Whimsy Takes Me’. Christina at Rochester Reader has an informal Dorothy L. Sayers challenge going on which on a more albeit sub
conscious level has had as much influence on my rediscovered love of Sayers as
reading ‘The Attenbury Emeralds’ did. I followed up ‘Clouds of Witness’ with ‘The
Nine Tailors’ which was another Sayers that I didn't really get when I first read
it, and happily remembered absolutely nothing about.
Coming back to it years
later with a warm affection for Sayers (and Whimsy) has been a treat and is a
timely reminder not to dispose of books lightly. A month or so ago I would have
thought I had no use for any but the books which also had Harriet in them which
might have ended up expensive when I realised I was wrong.
‘The Nine Tailors’ is a curious book, as a mystery it’s not
the best I’ve ever read, there are things that I don’t feel hold together
brilliantly, but on the other hand, and certainly more importantly, the
atmosphere is brilliant. Bleak midwinter in the Fens, a fantastic church, the sense
of threat that comes with a suspicious death and any number of other details
that set the scene, all underpinned by the arcane details of bell ringing. I
can understand why it’s such a favourite with Sayers fans.
I can also see why critics aren’t over impressed with the
bell ringing bits. They are both hypnotic and dull. The bells themselves emerge
with distinct personalities as well as their own particular menace which turns
out to be well earned... The information about ringing in its very dullness
gives a hint of a closed world governed by arcane rules. I have also tried to
find out if the method of murder is feasible, the internet is inconclusive on
this point with the chances being that it’s unlikely. This doesn’t in the least
matter either because it’s a really good story. There are thieves and emeralds,
a couple of cases of bigamy, an absent minded but delightfully dynamic vicar,
and a young woman who knows her own mind when it comes to getting an education.
And of course The Bells.
The other great charm of the book is nostalgia. Presumable an
inevitable part of getting older is this craving for the past. I find it vaguely
disconcerting that a book written in the 1930’s reminds me of my own youth in
the 1970’s, but after a day dealing with the public retreating to a world where
people have impeccable manners is a delight.
(Sadly this is not the book cover I own, but it was so pretty I couldn't help but use it.)
I think this was the first mystery by Sayers that I read when I was still at school. I generally prefer the Harriet Vane books, but this is still a favourite.
ReplyDeleteI can see why. It's very clever and very atmospheric. I can see myself reading it many more times?
ReplyDeleteThis is one of my favourite Wimseys, even though, like you, I generally prefer the Harriet books. The atmosphere is wonderful, I even liked the bell-ringing bits & the old vicar (forgotten his name) is supposed to be based on Sayers's father.
ReplyDeleteLyn, I loved this book, and probably more because it isn't without its flaws. I love the solution to the mystery, and the Vicar is just a peach of a character.
ReplyDeleteAnd don't forget the Vicar's wife! Mrs Venables is also a peach, and a practical one. This is one of my favorites, for all the reasons you gave. I especially like Hilary Thorpe, and I wish we knew how her story turned out - maybe she ended up at Shrewsbury College. I thought there was a reference in this book to Peter taking Harriet to dinner, but now I can't find it.
ReplyDeleteLisa May - I know the scene you mean, I think, and I think it's probably in Gaudy Night. I am now going off to bed where I won't sleep until I've checked and found it :)
ReplyDeleteNo, I've just remembered, it's in Murder Must Advertise. He "went out to keep his date with the one young woman who showed no signs of yielding to him, and what he said or did on that occasion is in no way related to this story." (Ch VII).
ReplyDeletesharing knowledge with others
ReplyDeletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ylRA41TZ9zU